Yao v Zhang [2007] FCA 1405
Given the limitations of the Federal Court's jurisdiction and in the interests of justice, including the need to avoid the applicant being statute-barred, the proceeding should be transferred to the Supreme Court of Queensland pursuant to s 5(4) of the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (Cth).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 September 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Application for Transfer of Proceedings
- Outcome
- Application granted for transfer of proceedings
- Legal Topics
- ['jurisdiction' 'transfer of Proceedings' 'cross Vesting' 'statute of Limitations']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application / Application for Transfer of Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proceeding should be transferred to the Supreme Court of Queensland pursuant to s 5(4) of the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (Cth)' 'Whether it is in the interests of justice for the proceeding to be determined by another court' 'Whether the applicant would be statute-barred if the application were dismissed']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the limitations of the Federal Court's jurisdiction and in the interests of justice, including the need to avoid the applicant being statute-barred, the proceeding should be transferred to the Supreme Court of Queensland pursuant to s 5(4) of the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (Cth).
Court Disposition
Application granted for transfer of proceedings
Orders
- ['Pursuant to section 5(4) Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (Cth) Federal Court proceedings number QUD254/2007 be transferred to the Supreme Court of Queensland.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment