Board of Fire Commissioners (NSW) v Ardouin [1961] HCA 71
The appeal was dismissed because the plea did not disclose a defence under s. 46. Driving a fire brigade vehicle on a public street to reach a fire was not the exercise of a statutory power conferred by the Fire Brigades Act, 1909-1956 N.S.W.; it was, at most, incidental to the performance of duties under ss. 19 and 28 and required no special statutory authority. The requirement to proceed with all speed did not displace the duty to exercise reasonable care for road users. Accordingly, s. 46 did not exempt the Board from liability for negligence alleged in the driving of the vehicle.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Negligence Action Concerning a Road Collision Involving a Fire Brigade Vehicle / Appeal by Leave to the High Court From a Supreme Court Judgment Sustaining the Plaintiff's Demurrer to the Defendant's Plea
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['liability of Fire Brigade Authority' 'statutory Immunity' 'bona Fide Exercise of Statutory Powers' 'duty of Care in Emergency Driving' 'demurrer']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Negligence Action Concerning a Road Collision Involving a Fire Brigade Vehicle / Appeal by Leave to the High Court From a Supreme Court Judgment Sustaining the Plaintiff's Demurrer to the Defendant's Plea
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether s. 46 of the Fire Brigades Act, 1909-1956 N.S.W. provided a defence to a negligence claim arising from the driving of a fire brigade vehicle on a public street while proceeding to a fire.' 'Whether ss. 19 and 28 of the Fire Brigades Act, 1909-1956 N.S.W. conferred a relevant statutory power to drive on a public highway so that damage caused by such driving was damage caused in the bona fide exercise of powers under s. 46.' 'Whether the duty to proceed to a fire with all speed removed or qualified the common law duty to take reasonable care for other road users.']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the plea did not disclose a defence under s. 46. Driving a fire brigade vehicle on a public street to reach a fire was not the exercise of a statutory power conferred by the Fire Brigades Act, 1909-1956 N.S.W.; it was, at most, incidental to the performance of duties under ss. 19 and 28 and required no special statutory authority. The requirement to proceed with all speed did not displace the duty to exercise reasonable care for road users. Accordingly, s. 46 did not exempt the Board from liability for negligence alleged in the driving of the vehicle.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment