Baker v R [2023] NSWCCA 262

Baker v R [2023] NSWCCA 262

The Court held that the evidence overwhelmingly established beyond reasonable doubt that the applicant's neglect, resulting in cachexia and pressure sores, made a significant contribution to the hastening of the deceased's death, thus proving causation. The possibility that the death resulted solely from the third stroke was merely a bare possibility, not a reasonable one. The sentence of 5 years' imprisonment (3 years non-parole) for a high seriousness offence was not manifestly excessive.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 October 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Judgment on Applications for Leave and Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Leave to appeal against conviction and sentence granted; appeals dismissed
Legal Topics
['manslaughter by Neglect' 'causation' 'appeals Conviction and Sentence' 'sentencing' 'criminal Negligence']
['criminal Law'] ['manslaughter by Neglect' 'causation' 'appeals Conviction and Sentence' 'sentencing' 'criminal Negligence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Judgment on Applications for Leave and Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the evidence left open a reasonable possibility that the deceased's cachexia and pressure sores were not causative of his death (causation issue)" 'Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive (manifest excess issue)']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the evidence overwhelmingly established beyond reasonable doubt that the applicant's neglect, resulting in cachexia and pressure sores, made a significant contribution to the hastening of the deceased's death, thus proving causation. The possibility that the death resulted solely from the third stroke was merely a bare possibility, not a reasonable one. The sentence of 5 years' imprisonment (3 years non-parole) for a high seriousness offence was not manifestly excessive.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal against conviction and sentence granted; appeals dismissed

Orders

  • ['Extend the time in which the applicant may seek leave to appeal against conviction and sentence up to and including 15 July 2023' 'Grant the applicant leave to appeal against conviction' 'Dismiss the appeal against conviction' 'Grant the applicant leave to appeal against sentence' 'Dismiss the appeal against...