Liberty Grove (Concord) Pty Limited v Mirvac Projects Pty Limited [2006] NSWSC 1168
Certain interrogatories are to be ordered on the basis of necessity for understanding accounting documents, but the core entitlement to verification of defendant's calculations is to be determined as a separate question by the Court; remaining aspects of the motion are stood over pending that determination.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Liberty Grove (Concord) Pty Limited; Defendant: Mirvac Projects Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Contractual Dispute / Interlocutory Motion (interrogatories, Separate Question)
- Outcome
- Partial grant of motion: nominated interrogatories allowed; separate question to be ordered; balance of motion stood over.
- Legal Topics
- Interrogatories, Separate Question Orders, Contract Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Liberty Grove (Concord) Pty Limited
Plaintiff
Mirvac Projects Pty Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contractual Dispute / Interlocutory Motion (interrogatories, Separate Question)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiff is contractually entitled to verify defendant's calculation of profit on development
- 2 Whether interrogatories should be allowed prior to resolution of entitlement to verification
- 3 Whether contract yields implied term entitling access to information
Ratio Decidendi
Certain interrogatories are to be ordered on the basis of necessity for understanding accounting documents, but the core entitlement to verification of defendant's calculations is to be determined as a separate question by the Court; remaining aspects of the motion are stood over pending that determination.
Court Disposition
Partial grant of motion: nominated interrogatories allowed; separate question to be ordered; balance of motion stood over.
Orders
- Liberty permitted to administer nominated interrogatories (questions 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13) to Mirvac.
- Liberty to pay Mirvac's reasonable costs of answering, capped at $15,000 in first instance.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment