Light Brigade Properties Pty Ltd v Woollahra Council [2018] NSWLEC 1011
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement and made orders giving effect to it.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 January 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Proceedings Concerning a Modification Application and a Building Certificate Application / Final Orders Following a Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- In appeal No. 2017/202008, the appeal was upheld and Modification Application No. 33/2015/2 was approved subject to conditions. In appeal No. 2017/202019, determination of Building Certificate Application No. 24/2016 was deferred and the respondent was directed to issue a building certificate once the specified...
- Legal Topics
- ['conciliation Conference' 'section 34 Agreement' 'modification of Development Consent' 'deferred Determination of Building Certificate Application']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Proceedings Concerning a Modification Application and a Building Certificate Application / Final Orders Following a Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the parties had reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 as to terms of a decision acceptable to them.' 'Whether the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions.' "What orders should be made to give effect to the parties' agreement."]
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement and made orders giving effect to it.
Court Disposition
In appeal No. 2017/202008, the appeal was upheld and Modification Application No. 33/2015/2 was approved subject to conditions. In appeal No. 2017/202019, determination of Building Certificate Application No. 24/2016 was deferred and the respondent was directed to issue a building certificate once the specified...
Orders
- ["In appeal No. 2017/202008: The Applicant is granted leave to amend Modification Application No. 33/2015/2 in accordance with the plans and documents specified in condition A.3(a) of Annexure 'A'." 'In appeal No. 2017/202008: The appeal is upheld.' "In appeal No. 2017/202008: Modification Application No. 33/2015/2...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment