Chel v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 355
Given that the plaintiff has an arguable case on legal errors by the primary judge, and in consideration of the value of the right to trial by jury in defamation proceedings, an expedited concurrent hearing of the leave and appeal and the grant of interim relief (stay) pending their determination is warranted to avoid potential wastage and ensure fairness.
- Parties
- Appellant: Lili Chel; First Respondent: Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd; Second Respondent: Vanda Carson
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (interlocutory) / Application for Interim Relief Pending Hearing of Summons for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Interim stay granted; expedited hearing ordered; costs of interim relief to plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- Interim Relief, Right to Jury Trial, Leave to Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lili Chel
Appellant
Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd
First Respondent
Vanda Carson
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (interlocutory) / Application for Interim Relief Pending Hearing of Summons for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants can unilaterally withdraw an earlier election for a jury trial in defamation proceedings
- 2 Whether a party is estopped from revoking an election for trial by jury
- 3 Whether the court can extend time for the plaintiff to elect for a jury trial under UCPR r 29.2A(2)(a)
Ratio Decidendi
Given that the plaintiff has an arguable case on legal errors by the primary judge, and in consideration of the value of the right to trial by jury in defamation proceedings, an expedited concurrent hearing of the leave and appeal and the grant of interim relief (stay) pending their determination is warranted to avoid potential wastage and ensure fairness.
Court Disposition
Interim stay granted; expedited hearing ordered; costs of interim relief to plaintiff.
Orders
- The plaintiff's application for leave to appeal and the appeal that would follow if leave were granted be heard on a concurrent basis on Friday 20 November 2015, with an estimate of half a day.
- Adamson J's decision to hear Common Law Division proceedings 2011/409423 without a jury be stayed until the determination of the plaintiff's application for leave to appeal or, if granted, the plaintiff's appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment