Wahbe v Blacktown City Council [2024] NSWLEC 1380
The jurisdictional prerequisites for modification under s 4.55(1A) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 are met: the modification is of minimal environmental impact, the modified development remains substantially the same, and notification requirements are satisfied. The Court is required to make the orders agreed to by the parties under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Parties
- Applicant: Lilian Wahbe; Respondent: Blacktown City Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Post Conciliation Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; consent modified
- Legal Topics
- Modification Application, Development Consent, Conciliation Conference
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lilian Wahbe
Applicant
Blacktown City Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Conciliation Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether MOD-22-00452 meets jurisdictional prerequisites for modification under s 4.55(1A) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
- 2 Whether the proposed modification is of minimal environmental impact
- 3 Whether the development as modified remains substantially the same
Ratio Decidendi
The jurisdictional prerequisites for modification under s 4.55(1A) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 are met: the modification is of minimal environmental impact, the modified development remains substantially the same, and notification requirements are satisfied. The Court is required to make the orders agreed to by the parties under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; consent modified
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- Development Consent No. DA-20-00198 is modified in the terms set out in Annexure A.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment