Regina v Lim Yok Peng [2002] NSWCCA 208
Principles of parity in sentencing require the adjustment of the applicant's sentence, given that a co-offender (Koh), whose criminality was ultimately assessed as greater but sentenced on a lesser basis, received a lower sentence. To avoid justified sense of grievance and to maintain parity, the applicant's sentence must be reduced to the same level as his co-offender Yeoh.
- Parties
- Applicant: Lim Yok Peng; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Sentencing Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; sentence quashed; applicant resentenced
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Conspiracy to Defraud, Parity, Proportionality
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lim Yok Peng
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Sentencing Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed on the applicant was manifestly excessive in light of parity and proportionality with co-offenders.
- 2 Whether the principle of parity required a reduction in the applicant's sentence given the sentences imposed on co-offenders, particularly Koh.
Ratio Decidendi
Principles of parity in sentencing require the adjustment of the applicant's sentence, given that a co-offender (Koh), whose criminality was ultimately assessed as greater but sentenced on a lesser basis, received a lower sentence. To avoid justified sense of grievance and to maintain parity, the applicant's sentence must be reduced to the same level as his co-offender Yeoh.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; sentence quashed; applicant resentenced
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted.
- Appeal allowed; sentence quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment