Regina v Lim Yok Peng [2002] NSWCCA 208

Regina v Lim Yok Peng [2002] NSWCCA 208

Principles of parity in sentencing require the adjustment of the applicant's sentence, given that a co-offender (Koh), whose criminality was ultimately assessed as greater but sentenced on a lesser basis, received a lower sentence. To avoid justified sense of grievance and to maintain parity, the applicant's sentence must be reduced to the same level as his co-offender Yeoh.

Parties
Applicant: Lim Yok Peng; Respondent: Regina
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
31 May 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Sentencing Appeal
Outcome
appeal allowed; sentence quashed; applicant resentenced
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Conspiracy to Defraud, Parity, Proportionality

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lim Yok Peng

Applicant

Regina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Sentencing Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed on the applicant was manifestly excessive in light of parity and proportionality with co-offenders.
  2. 2 Whether the principle of parity required a reduction in the applicant's sentence given the sentences imposed on co-offenders, particularly Koh.

Ratio Decidendi

Principles of parity in sentencing require the adjustment of the applicant's sentence, given that a co-offender (Koh), whose criminality was ultimately assessed as greater but sentenced on a lesser basis, received a lower sentence. To avoid justified sense of grievance and to maintain parity, the applicant's sentence must be reduced to the same level as his co-offender Yeoh.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed; sentence quashed; applicant resentenced

Orders

  • Leave to appeal granted.
  • Appeal allowed; sentence quashed.