LINACRE v STEPHENSON [1995] NSWCA 260
On the material before the court, it was not appropriate to grant a stay of the judgment; factual findings favouring respondent are not grounds for stay.
- Parties
- Appellant: Linacre; Respondent: Stephenson
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 September 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Stay Pending Appeal / Application for Stay Before Appellate Court
- Outcome
- Application for stay refused with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Application for Stay, Motor Vehicle Accident, Personal Injury, Contributory Negligence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Linacre
Appellant
Stephenson
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Stay Pending Appeal / Application for Stay Before Appellate Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether judgment below should be stayed pending appeal
- 2 Whether amount recoverable by respondent was less than threshold under Motor Accidents Act 1988
- 3 Whether trial judge erred in rejecting contributory negligence defense
Ratio Decidendi
On the material before the court, it was not appropriate to grant a stay of the judgment; factual findings favouring respondent are not grounds for stay.
Court Disposition
Application for stay refused with costs.
Orders
- Application for stay refused with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment