Linbay Pty Limited v Marrickville Council [2004] NSWLEC 193
The development application, considered under s 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and relevant controls, was found satisfactory as the subdivision and building form fit in with the street's character, architectural style, setbacks, and car parking provision balanced with design and transport access.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal upheld and development application approved subject to deferred commencement and conditions
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'subdivision' 'streetscape' 'height and Architectural Style' 'setbacks' 'car Parking']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed subdivision is consistent with the existing subdivision pattern in the street' 'Whether the height and design of the proposed dwellings will impact the streetscape and whether the design is complimentary to development in the street' 'Whether the proposed side boundary setbacks are acceptable' 'Whether the proposed on-site car parking arrangements are satisfactory']
Ratio Decidendi
The development application, considered under s 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and relevant controls, was found satisfactory as the subdivision and building form fit in with the street's character, architectural style, setbacks, and car parking provision balanced with design and transport access.
Court Disposition
appeal upheld and development application approved subject to deferred commencement and conditions
Orders
- ['The appeal under s 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 is upheld.' 'Development application No 200300629 is approved subject to deferred commencement and Conditions 1 to 52 in Annexure A.' 'The exhibits with the exception of Exhibits A, D, 2 and 6 are returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment