Langov v Denkov; Denkov v Langov [2017] NSWCATCD 69
Kole Denkov is found to be the builder within the meaning of the Home Building Act 1989, personally liable for defective work under statutory warranties. He failed to provide Home Owners' Warranty insurance, precluding entitlement to contract or quantum meruit payments. The contract was abandoned by mutual conduct in February 2016, and damages for rectification in the amount of $161,066 are awarded to the homeowners based on uncontested expert evidence. Denkov's cross-claim is dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Building Dispute / Final Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for homeowners; builder's claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['statutory Warranties' 'defective Building Work' 'contract Abandonment' 'quantum Meruit' 'insurance Compliance']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Building Dispute / Final Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Is Kole Denkov 'the builder' within the meaning of the Home Building Act 1989?" 'Is Kolemain Constructions Pty Ltd a party to the contract and liable?' 'Entitlement to damages for defective work' 'Whether the contract was abandoned or terminated' 'Entitlement of builder to quantum meruit claim without insurance']
Ratio Decidendi
Kole Denkov is found to be the builder within the meaning of the Home Building Act 1989, personally liable for defective work under statutory warranties. He failed to provide Home Owners' Warranty insurance, precluding entitlement to contract or quantum meruit payments. The contract was abandoned by mutual conduct in February 2016, and damages for rectification in the amount of $161,066 are awarded to the homeowners based on uncontested expert evidence. Denkov's cross-claim is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Judgment for homeowners; builder's claim dismissed
Orders
- ['Kole Denkov shall pay to Linda Langov the sum of $161,066 within 28 days of these orders.' "The builder's claim HB 16/56088 is dismissed." 'Question of costs will be determined post written submissions.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment