Lindeman Limited v Colvin [1946] HCA 35
The broken leg was a distinct and separate injury attributable to a pathological bone condition, not an effect of the employment-related head injury or its reasonable medical treatment. The Workers’ Compensation Commission erred in law by attributing total incapacity following the leg fracture to the original employment injury, as no sufficient causal connection was established.
- Parties
- Appellant: Lindeman Limited; Respondent: Hugh Colvin
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / High Court Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales (full Court), Case Stated Under S.37(4) Workers' Compensation Act
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Order of Full Court set aside except as to costs. Questions in case answered in the affirmative. Appellant to pay costs of appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Causal Connection, Injury Arising Out of and in the Course of Employment, Medical Treatment Causation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lindeman Limited
Appellant
Hugh Colvin
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / High Court Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales (full Court), Case Stated Under S.37(4) Workers' Compensation Act
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a broken leg sustained during prescribed convalescence was causally connected to the employment-related head injury
- 2 Whether the Workers' Compensation Commission erred in law in finding that the chain of causation between head injury and subsequent total incapacity was unbroken
Ratio Decidendi
The broken leg was a distinct and separate injury attributable to a pathological bone condition, not an effect of the employment-related head injury or its reasonable medical treatment. The Workers’ Compensation Commission erred in law by attributing total incapacity following the leg fracture to the original employment injury, as no sufficient causal connection was established.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Order of Full Court set aside except as to costs. Questions in case answered in the affirmative. Appellant to pay costs of appeal.
Orders
- Appeal allowed
- Order of Full Court set aside except as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment