Darr v Keating [2019] NSWLEC 1196
Only the root growth of the western tree caused damage (displacement of fencing panels), and remedial orders are appropriate; no causal connection between the trees and other asserted damage or risk. Respondent as occupier qualifies for orders under the Act.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (nsw) Application / Final Judgment and Orders
- Outcome
- Orders made for repair of boundary fence; tree removal not ordered; applicant's sought orders refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['tree Disputes' 'damage to Fence' 'owner/occupier Definition' 'remedial Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (nsw) Application / Final Judgment and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether trees on respondent's property caused damage to applicant's property or posed risk of injury" 'Whether orders should be made for removal of trees or for repair of damage caused by trees' 'Whether respondent as occupier can be ordered to carry out works']
Ratio Decidendi
Only the root growth of the western tree caused damage (displacement of fencing panels), and remedial orders are appropriate; no causal connection between the trees and other asserted damage or risk. Respondent as occupier qualifies for orders under the Act.
Court Disposition
Orders made for repair of boundary fence; tree removal not ordered; applicant's sought orders refused.
Orders
- ['Within 90 days, respondent to engage fencing contractor to repair two displaced fencing panels so their alignment is consistent with rest of fence and provide at least 50 mm clearance to base of western tree.' 'On reasonable notice, applicant to allow access for fence works during reasonable hours.' 'Order for...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment