Rutherford v Wallace [1999] NSWCA 299
On the facts as found, there was no trust in favour of the appellant or the estate in respect of the Right of Burial; it was acquired in the name of the respondent, and no communication or agreement was established indicating that she would hold it on trust for the appellant or for the estate. The appeal was dismissed (by the majority).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 September 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs (by majority)
- Legal Topics
- ['rights of Burial' 'implied Trusts' 'constructive Trusts']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Right of Burial was held by the respondent on trust for the appellant or his wife's estate" 'Nature of the Right of Burial as property' 'Whether there was a resulting, constructive or implied trust in favour of the appellant']
Ratio Decidendi
On the facts as found, there was no trust in favour of the appellant or the estate in respect of the Right of Burial; it was acquired in the name of the respondent, and no communication or agreement was established indicating that she would hold it on trust for the appellant or for the estate. The appeal was dismissed (by the majority).
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs (by majority)
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed with costs' 'Declaration (per Fitzgerald JA) that the respondent is not solely entitled to the rights associated with the Right of Burial but holds those rights on behalf of the administrator of the estate of her deceased mother']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment