Link Investments Ltd v DC Rd DC Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 610

The application for leave to appeal was dismissed as the primary judge did not mistake the facts, miscarry discretion, or act on a wrong principle; the steps required under the Sabre order were not unreasonably onerous, and the Orders were consistent with the principles governing leave to appeal and practice and procedure decisions.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 31 May 2024
Procedural Posture: Application for Leave to Appeal / Interlocutory – Leave to Appeal Decision
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Legal Topics: ['interlocutory Applications' 'discovery' 'practice and Procedure – Discretionary Decisions' 'sabre Orders' 'reasonableness of Steps for Access to Documents']

['appeal and New Trial' 'civil Practice and Procedure' 'commercial Law'] ['interlocutory Applications' 'discovery' 'practice and Procedure – Discretionary Decisions' 'sabre Orders' 'reasonableness of Steps for Access to Documents']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Interlocutory – Leave to Appeal Decision

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether steps required to obtain bank account statements were reasonably necessary under a Sabre order' 'Whether the primary judge misapplied legal principles or mistook facts in making practice and procedure orders' 'Relevant principles for granting leave to appeal from a single judge’s practice and procedure decision']

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed

Orders

['The application for leave to appeal filed on 15 March 2024 be dismissed with costs.']