Desanges v Johnson [2004] NSWSC 785
The court found no denial of procedural fairness or error of law in the Local Court proceedings. The plaintiff had a reasonable opportunity to appear and make submissions, and the evidence supported the Local Court's findings, including the existence of a costs agreement. The attempted new grounds of appeal regarding the Legal Profession Act 1987 could not be raised at this stage as they were not litigated below.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 September 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Summons to Appeal From Local Court Decision
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed; plaintiff to pay the costs of the summons; application for indemnity costs referred to a registrar for determination.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal' 'procedural Fairness' 'costs Recovery']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Summons to Appeal From Local Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether there was a denial of procedural fairness in Local Court proceedings' "Whether there was error in law in the Local Court's judgment regarding costs recovery and enforceability of costs agreement"]
Ratio Decidendi
The court found no denial of procedural fairness or error of law in the Local Court proceedings. The plaintiff had a reasonable opportunity to appear and make submissions, and the evidence supported the Local Court's findings, including the existence of a costs agreement. The attempted new grounds of appeal regarding the Legal Profession Act 1987 could not be raised at this stage as they were not litigated below.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed; plaintiff to pay the costs of the summons; application for indemnity costs referred to a registrar for determination.
Orders
- ['The summons is dismissed.' 'The plaintiff is to pay the costs of the summons.' 'The application for costs to be paid on an indemnity basis is referred to a registrar for determination.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment