Weldon v R (No 2) [2019] NSWCCA 206
Consequent upon refusal of the adjournment application, the applicant's solicitor withdrew, and the applicant indicated that he did not have sufficient funds and wished to use a work release program to save funds to prosecute the appeal. In those circumstances, the Court dismissed the application for leave to appeal, while noting that this did not preclude a further application for leave with an extension of time.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal Against Sentence / Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Sentence' 'application for Leave to Appeal' 'application for Adjournment' 'withdrawal of Solicitor' 'extension of Time']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Against Sentence / Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the application for leave to appeal should be dismissed after the application for adjournment was refused and the applicant's solicitor withdrew." 'Whether dismissal would preclude a further application for leave to appeal with an extension of time.']
Ratio Decidendi
Consequent upon refusal of the adjournment application, the applicant's solicitor withdrew, and the applicant indicated that he did not have sufficient funds and wished to use a work release program to save funds to prosecute the appeal. In those circumstances, the Court dismissed the application for leave to appeal, while noting that this did not preclude a further application for leave with an extension of time.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Dismiss application for leave to appeal.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment