Lipa Pharmaceuticals Limited (ACN 070 106 526) No 2, in the matter of Lipa Pharmaceuticals Limited (ACN 070 106 526) [2007] FCA 1628
The Court was satisfied that the scheme meeting was duly convened as per Court order, approved by the requisite majority of shareholders, unopposed by ASIC, and not subject to any notice of objection; thus, the scheme was approved under s 411(4)(b) and 411(6) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 October 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Scheme of Arrangement Under the Corporations Act / Application for Court Approval of Scheme
- Outcome
- Scheme of arrangement approved.
- Legal Topics
- ['scheme of Arrangement' 'court Approval of Schemes' 'shareholder Meeting' 'asic Role in Schemes']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Scheme of Arrangement Under the Corporations Act / Application for Court Approval of Scheme
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the scheme of arrangement between Lipa Pharmaceuticals Limited and its shareholders should be approved under s 411(4)(b) and 411(6) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was satisfied that the scheme meeting was duly convened as per Court order, approved by the requisite majority of shareholders, unopposed by ASIC, and not subject to any notice of objection; thus, the scheme was approved under s 411(4)(b) and 411(6) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
Court Disposition
Scheme of arrangement approved.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to subsection 411(4)(b) and 411(6) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the scheme of arrangement between Lipa Pharmaceuticals Limited and the holders of ordinary shares be approved.' 'Pursuant to section 411(12) of the Act, Lipa is exempted from compliance with section 411(11) of the Act.' 'These Orders...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment