Brooks (Liquidator) v Bull, in the matter of DV Bull Pty Ltd (in liq) [2021] FCA 967
The Court was satisfied, on the evidence, that Mr Bull and/or Ms Prince have removed and concealed property of the company, including trust property, thereby preventing or delaying the liquidator's custody or control, thus enlivening the power to issue a warrant under s 530C(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Shelley-Maree Brooks; Second Plaintiff: DV Bull Pty Ltd; First Defendant: Darcy Vincent Bull; Second Defendant: Tiana Prince
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 August 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Ex Parte Hearing for Warrant and Confidentiality Orders
- Outcome
- Application granted.
- Legal Topics
- Liquidator's Powers, Warrant to Search and Seize Company Property, Trust Property as Company Property
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shelley-Maree Brooks
First Plaintiff
DV Bull Pty Ltd
Second Plaintiff
Darcy Vincent Bull
First Defendant
Tiana Prince
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application / Ex Parte Hearing for Warrant and Confidentiality Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether trust assets are considered property of the company for the purposes of s 530C of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
- 2 Whether Mr Bull and/or Ms Prince have concealed or removed property of the company, thereby preventing or delaying the liquidator's custody or control
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was satisfied, on the evidence, that Mr Bull and/or Ms Prince have removed and concealed property of the company, including trust property, thereby preventing or delaying the liquidator's custody or control, thus enlivening the power to issue a warrant under s 530C(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
Court Disposition
Application granted.
Orders
- The Deputy District Registrar to issue a warrant pursuant to s 530C(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
- Requirement to serve originating process on defendants dispensed with; leave granted for ex parte application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment