Ryan v Hewitt [2003] NSWIRComm 136
The applicant was dismissed without prior warning or opportunity to explain her absences, which were legitimate. No evidence was provided that justified failure to warn or counsel the applicant. Therefore, the dismissal was harsh, unreasonable and unjust.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Unfair Dismissal Application / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Complaint upheld, compensation awarded instead of reinstatement.
- Legal Topics
- ['unfair Dismissal' 'notice of Termination' 'parental Responsibility' 'sick Leave' 'warning and Counselling Procedures']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Unfair Dismissal Application / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the dismissal of the applicant was harsh, unreasonable and unjust under section 84 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996' 'Whether adequate warning and counselling was provided prior to termination']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant was dismissed without prior warning or opportunity to explain her absences, which were legitimate. No evidence was provided that justified failure to warn or counsel the applicant. Therefore, the dismissal was harsh, unreasonable and unjust.
Court Disposition
Complaint upheld, compensation awarded instead of reinstatement.
Orders
- ['Fun Venture Pty Ltd is ordered to pay Ms Lisa Ann Ryan the amount of $3,953.75 within 21 days of the date of the decision.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment