R v Butler [2000] NSWCCA 525
The sentence exceeded legitimate sentencing discretion because it failed to properly consider the applicant's youthfulness and personal circumstances. Although deterrence is important, the impulsive and opportunistic nature of the offence, the abandonment of the attempt, and the applicant’s efforts at rehabilitation warranted reduction of the non-parole period. Technical correction required for parole order. Leave to appeal was granted, appeal allowed, sentence quashed, and a new non-parole period imposed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal, Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted, appeal allowed, sentence quashed, new sentence imposed.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'appeals' 'attempted Escape From Custody']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal, Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive' 'Failure to make a parole order under s 24 of Sentencing Act 1989' 'Parity with co-offender']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence exceeded legitimate sentencing discretion because it failed to properly consider the applicant's youthfulness and personal circumstances. Although deterrence is important, the impulsive and opportunistic nature of the offence, the abandonment of the attempt, and the applicant’s efforts at rehabilitation warranted reduction of the non-parole period. Technical correction required for parole order. Leave to appeal was granted, appeal allowed, sentence quashed, and a new non-parole period imposed.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted, appeal allowed, sentence quashed, new sentence imposed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal allowed' 'Original sentence quashed' "Applicant sentenced to a total term of eighteen months' imprisonment with a non-parole period of nine months to commence from 3 March 2000" 'Applicant directed for immediate release as soon as administrative procedures affected']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment