Lisa Joy Pty Ltd v Brothers Neilsen International Pty Ltd [2003) FCA 986
Security for costs is ordered in the amount of $18,000 because applicant corporation is unable to meet an order for costs, and security should not be on a full indemnity basis but set at a fair and just amount considering the relevant estimates and principles.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 September 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion Seeking Security for Costs / Ruling on Application for Security for Costs
- Outcome
- Application for security for costs granted. Proceedings stayed until security of $18,000 is provided to satisfaction of Registrar.
- Legal Topics
- ['security for Costs' 'impecuniosity' 'discretionary Powers']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion Seeking Security for Costs / Ruling on Application for Security for Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether security for costs should be ordered against the applicant company.' 'The amount of security to be ordered.' 'Impecuniosity of applicant and its effect on security for costs.']
Ratio Decidendi
Security for costs is ordered in the amount of $18,000 because applicant corporation is unable to meet an order for costs, and security should not be on a full indemnity basis but set at a fair and just amount considering the relevant estimates and principles.
Court Disposition
Application for security for costs granted. Proceedings stayed until security of $18,000 is provided to satisfaction of Registrar.
Orders
- ['The proceedings be stayed unless and until the applicant provides security in the sum of $18,000 to the satisfaction of the Registrar.' "The costs of the application for security for costs be the parties' costs in the cause."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment