Neville v Lam (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 300
An adjournment is not warranted based on current evidence regarding Samuel Nowak's vision. The preferable course is to sever the quantification of damages concerning the cost of rearing and maintaining Samuel, to be decided separately after determination of all other issues.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Decision on Adjournment and Severance of Issue
- Outcome
- Application for adjournment refused. Order for separate determination of quantum of damages concerning cost of rearing and maintaining Samuel Nowak. Costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- ['adjournment' 'severance of Issue' 'quantum of Damages']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Decision on Adjournment and Severance of Issue
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether to grant an adjournment of proceedings' 'Whether to sever the issue of quantification of damages for cost of rearing and maintaining Samuel Nowak']
Ratio Decidendi
An adjournment is not warranted based on current evidence regarding Samuel Nowak's vision. The preferable course is to sever the quantification of damages concerning the cost of rearing and maintaining Samuel, to be decided separately after determination of all other issues.
Court Disposition
Application for adjournment refused. Order for separate determination of quantum of damages concerning cost of rearing and maintaining Samuel Nowak. Costs reserved.
Orders
- ['Application for an adjournment refused.' "Order pursuant to r 28.2 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) that the following question be decided separately after the trial of all other issues: 'What is the quantum of damages recoverable by the plaintiff, if any, for the cost of rearing and maintaining her...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment