Taylor v Sciberras [2004] NSWADT 104
The Tribunal found as fact that Mr Sciberras engaged in persistent and unwelcome sexual harassment of Ms Taylor, constituting unlawful conduct under the NSW Anti-Discrimination Act. This conduct led to constructive dismissal and ongoing psychological harm, warranting damages and an award of costs in special circumstances.
- Parties
- Applicant: Lisa Taylor; Respondent: Sam Sciberras
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Sexual Harassment in Workplace Victimisation / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Applicant succeeds; Respondent found liable for sexual harassment and constructive dismissal
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Harassment, Constructive Dismissal, Victimisation, Hostile Work Environment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lisa Taylor
Applicant
Sam Sciberras
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Sexual Harassment in Workplace Victimisation / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sexual harassment occurred as alleged by the applicant
- 2 Whether conduct was unwelcome and against applicant's will
- 3 Whether applicant suffered loss and damage as a result of sexual harassment
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found as fact that Mr Sciberras engaged in persistent and unwelcome sexual harassment of Ms Taylor, constituting unlawful conduct under the NSW Anti-Discrimination Act. This conduct led to constructive dismissal and ongoing psychological harm, warranting damages and an award of costs in special circumstances.
Court Disposition
Applicant succeeds; Respondent found liable for sexual harassment and constructive dismissal
Orders
- Respondent to pay Applicant damages in the sum of $19,150 within 30 days of publication of decision
- Respondent to pay Applicant costs as agreed or as assessed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment