Lisimcol Pty Ltd v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2023] NSWCATOD 2
The Applicant contravened s 111(1) of the Property and Stock Agents Act 2002 (NSW) because it did not lodge or cause the required trust account audit to be completed within the required time, including the extended deadline. The Tribunal accepted the auditor's evidence that he was not instructed or made aware of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- External Review of Disciplinary Action Against Real Estate Licence Holder / Review of Internally Affirmed Decision; Decision Under Review Affirmed
- Outcome
- The decision under review is affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- ['trust Account Audit Requirements' 'disciplinary Action' 'failure to Lodge Trust Account Audit' 'adequacy of Penalty' 'correct and Preferable Decision']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
External Review of Disciplinary Action Against Real Estate Licence Holder / Review of Internally Affirmed Decision; Decision Under Review Affirmed
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Applicant contravened s 111(1) of the Property and Stock Agents Act 2002 (NSW) by failing to cause records and documents for its trust account to be audited within the required time.' 'Whether there were grounds for disciplinary action under s 191(a) of the Property and Stock Agents Act 2002 (NSW).' 'Whether a reprimand and monetary penalty of $5,500 under s 192 of the Property and Stock Agents Act 2002 (NSW) was the correct and preferable decision.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Applicant contravened s 111(1) of the Property and Stock Agents Act 2002 (NSW) because it did not lodge or cause the required trust account audit to be completed within the required time, including the extended deadline. The Tribunal accepted the auditor's evidence that he was not instructed or made aware of the Applicant's trust account until 12 July 2021, rejected the submission that copied correspondence or a Service NSW glitch constituted instructions to audit, and found the failure resulted from the Applicant's own inadequate administrative systems. Given the importance of trust account audits to consumer confidence and industry standards, the reprimand and $5,500 monetary...
Court Disposition
The decision under review is affirmed.
Orders
- ['The decision under review is affirmed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment