Lismore Venture Pty Ltd v Byron Shire Council [2020] NSWLEC 1299
Because the Commissioner was satisfied that the jurisdictional pre-requisites had been met, including permissibility under Byron Local Environmental Plan 2014, compliance or consideration of relevant provisions of State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009, notification and public submissions, earthworks, essential services and contamination matters, the parties' agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions. The Court was therefore required by s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal of a Development Application / Conciliation Conference Agreement and Final Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions; Applicant ordered to pay Respondent's costs thrown away.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'affordable Rental Housing' 'multi Dwelling Housing' 'conciliation Conference' 'consent Orders' 'costs Thrown Away']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal of a Development Application / Conciliation Conference Agreement and Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the parties' agreement following the conciliation conference was a decision the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979." 'Whether the jurisdictional pre-requisites for granting consent to Development Application 10.2019.458.1 were satisfied.' 'Whether the appeal should be upheld and development consent granted subject to conditions.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the Commissioner was satisfied that the jurisdictional pre-requisites had been met, including permissibility under Byron Local Environmental Plan 2014, compliance or consideration of relevant provisions of State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009, notification and public submissions, earthworks, essential services and contamination matters, the parties' agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions. The Court was therefore required by s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions; Applicant ordered to pay Respondent's costs thrown away.
Orders
- ["Leave is granted to the Applicant to rely upon the amended plans listed in Condition 1 at Annexure 'A'." 'Pursuant to section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the Applicant is to pay the costs of the Respondent that were thrown away as a result of amending the development application...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment