Litmus Australia Pty Ltd v Canty & Ors [2006] NSWSC 138

Litmus Australia Pty Ltd v Canty & Ors [2006] NSWSC 138

Leave is granted to both sides to file their respective late written submissions as there is no prejudice and both parties have opportunity to be heard; no order as to costs is made, each party to bear its own costs, in light of the conduct of legal representatives.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 March 2006
Procedural Posture
Corporations List Application / Interlocutory Stage (application to Strike Out and Costs)
Outcome
Leave granted to file further submissions; no order as to costs of the day.
Legal Topics
['interlocutory Applications' 'costs' 'strike Out Applications' 'procedural Fairness']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Corporations List Application / Interlocutory Stage (application to Strike Out and Costs)

  1. 1 ['Whether leave should be granted for late written submissions by defendants and by plaintiff' 'Whether order for costs should be made against plaintiff and/or its solicitor' 'Proper procedural conduct for resolving disputes between legal representatives']

Ratio Decidendi

Leave is granted to both sides to file their respective late written submissions as there is no prejudice and both parties have opportunity to be heard; no order as to costs is made, each party to bear its own costs, in light of the conduct of legal representatives.

Court Disposition

Leave granted to file further submissions; no order as to costs of the day.

Orders

  • ['Leave granted to first and third defendants to make further (late) submissions.' 'Leave granted to plaintiff to make submissions in reply.' 'No order as to costs for the day; each party to bear its own costs.']