Litmus Australia Pty Ltd v Canty & Ors [2006] NSWSC 138
Leave is granted to both sides to file their respective late written submissions as there is no prejudice and both parties have opportunity to be heard; no order as to costs is made, each party to bear its own costs, in light of the conduct of legal representatives.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations List Application / Interlocutory Stage (application to Strike Out and Costs)
- Outcome
- Leave granted to file further submissions; no order as to costs of the day.
- Legal Topics
- ['interlocutory Applications' 'costs' 'strike Out Applications' 'procedural Fairness']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations List Application / Interlocutory Stage (application to Strike Out and Costs)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted for late written submissions by defendants and by plaintiff' 'Whether order for costs should be made against plaintiff and/or its solicitor' 'Proper procedural conduct for resolving disputes between legal representatives']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave is granted to both sides to file their respective late written submissions as there is no prejudice and both parties have opportunity to be heard; no order as to costs is made, each party to bear its own costs, in light of the conduct of legal representatives.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to file further submissions; no order as to costs of the day.
Orders
- ['Leave granted to first and third defendants to make further (late) submissions.' 'Leave granted to plaintiff to make submissions in reply.' 'No order as to costs for the day; each party to bear its own costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment