Willoughby City Council v Livbuild Pty Ltd [2015] NSWLEC 34
For two offences of undertaking development without consent, the appropriate aggregate penalty must reflect both the objective seriousness of the unauthorised works (moderate for foreshore works, low for home theatre works), Livbuild’s intent and financial motivation, and be mitigated by substantial cooperation, guilty plea, and lack of prior convictions, resulting in a fine of $48,000 for the foreshore works offence and $19,000 for the home theatre works offence, with the defendant to pay the prosecutor’s assessed costs.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Willoughby City Council; Defendant: Livbuild Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 March 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Prosecution (environmental Offences) / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Conviction, fines imposed, and costs ordered against the defendant.
- Legal Topics
- Unauthorised Development, Development Without Consent, Sentencing Principles, Environmental Harm, Discount for Cooperation, Totality Principle
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Willoughby City Council
Prosecutor
Livbuild Pty Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution (environmental Offences) / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate sentence for Livbuild Pty Ltd for undertaking development without consent?
- 2 How should the cooperation of Livbuild and its subjective circumstances affect penalty?
- 3 Should the totality principle and discounts for guilty plea and assistance be applied, and if so to what extent?
Ratio Decidendi
For two offences of undertaking development without consent, the appropriate aggregate penalty must reflect both the objective seriousness of the unauthorised works (moderate for foreshore works, low for home theatre works), Livbuild’s intent and financial motivation, and be mitigated by substantial cooperation, guilty plea, and lack of prior convictions, resulting in a fine of $48,000 for the foreshore works offence and $19,000 for the home theatre works offence, with the defendant to pay the prosecutor’s assessed costs.
Court Disposition
Conviction, fines imposed, and costs ordered against the defendant.
Orders
- In proceedings no 50764 of 2014: the defendant is convicted as charged; the defendant is fined the sum of $48,000.
- In proceedings no 50767 of 2014: the defendant is convicted as charged; the defendant is fined the sum of $19,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment