Liverpool Plains Shire Council v Rumble (No 3) [2014] NSWLEC 139
Mr and Mrs Rumble were found guilty of wilful but not contumacious contempt of court orders by failing to comply with previous orders to remove vehicles and parts from property. Fines, including periodic fines to incentivize compliance, were imposed, with consideration given to their financial capacity. Costs awarded on an indemnity basis due to protracted proceedings.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt Proceedings / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Conviction of contempt and imposition of fines and costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['contempt of Court' 'sentencing' 'compliance With Court Orders' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Contempt Proceedings / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Mr and Mrs Rumble are in contempt of court orders' 'Appropriate penalty for contempt' 'Whether the contempt was wilful or contumacious' 'Ability to pay fines' 'Validity of court orders and procedural compliance']
Ratio Decidendi
Mr and Mrs Rumble were found guilty of wilful but not contumacious contempt of court orders by failing to comply with previous orders to remove vehicles and parts from property. Fines, including periodic fines to incentivize compliance, were imposed, with consideration given to their financial capacity. Costs awarded on an indemnity basis due to protracted proceedings.
Court Disposition
Conviction of contempt and imposition of fines and costs.
Orders
- ['Robert George Rumble convicted of contempt as particularised.' 'Robert George Rumble fined $10,000 to be paid within 28 days.' 'Robert George Rumble fined $15,000 per calendar month while in breach of court orders (periodic fine), suspended until 26 June 2014.' 'Lee Rumble convicted of contempt as particularised.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment