Coshott v Parker & Collins as Executors of the Estate of the late Michael Petrovic Lenin [2015] NSWSC 998
It would be unconscionable for the plaintiff to deny Ronald Coshott the right to subrogation for the amount he paid on her behalf at her request; thus, he is entitled to be subrogated to the rights of the defendants to the extent of his payment.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Ljiljana Coshott; First Defendant: Michelle Lena Parker; Second Defendant: Christina Marie Collins; Applicant: Ronald Coshott
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion / Post Judgment Application – Application for Subrogation Declaration
- Outcome
- Declaration of subrogation in favour of applicant; parties directed to bring in Short Minutes of Order; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Subrogation, Payment of Debt by Third Party, Creditor Substitution, Unconscionability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ljiljana Coshott
Plaintiff
Michelle Lena Parker
First Defendant
Christina Marie Collins
Second Defendant
Ronald Coshott
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Post Judgment Application – Application for Subrogation Declaration
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether payment of a judgment debt by a third party at the request of the debtor gives rise to a right of subrogation in favour of that third party
- 2 Whether it would be unconscionable for the debtor to deny the third party subrogation rights
Ratio Decidendi
It would be unconscionable for the plaintiff to deny Ronald Coshott the right to subrogation for the amount he paid on her behalf at her request; thus, he is entitled to be subrogated to the rights of the defendants to the extent of his payment.
Court Disposition
Declaration of subrogation in favour of applicant; parties directed to bring in Short Minutes of Order; costs reserved.
Orders
- A declaration that Ronald Coshott is subrogated to the rights of the defendants with respect to the judgment debt against the plaintiff entered on 14 December 2012.
- The parties are to bring in Short Minutes of Order reflecting this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment