Llanfoyst Holdings Pty Ltd v Randwick City Council [2019] NSWLEC 1289
The Court was satisfied that the agreed decision to grant development consent to the amended application subject to conditions was one it could make in the proper exercise of its functions because the residential flat building use was permissible in the R3 Medium Density Residential zone, the cl 4.6 written requests justified the height and floor space ratio contraventions, and the identified requirements relating to SEPP 65, SEPP 55 and BASIX were addressed. The proceedings were therefore disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Concerning a Development Application Deemed Refused / Final Orders Following Agreement Reached at a Conciliation Conference Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld and Development Application DA/420/2018 approved subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application Appeal' 'residential Flat Building' 'clause 4.6 Variation Requests' 'height Development Standard' 'floor Space Ratio Development Standard' 'conciliation Conference' 'development Consent by Agreement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Concerning a Development Application Deemed Refused / Final Orders Following Agreement Reached at a Conciliation Conference Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to amend the development application' 'Whether development consent should be granted to the amended application subject to conditions pursuant to s 4.16(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979' 'Whether the written request under cl 4.6 of the Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012 justified contravention of the height development standard' 'Whether the written request under cl 4.6 of the Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012 justified contravention of the floor space ratio development standard' 'Whether the agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was satisfied that the agreed decision to grant development consent to the amended application subject to conditions was one it could make in the proper exercise of its functions because the residential flat building use was permissible in the R3 Medium Density Residential zone, the cl 4.6 written requests justified the height and floor space ratio contraventions, and the identified requirements relating to SEPP 65, SEPP 55 and BASIX were addressed. The proceedings were therefore disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld and Development Application DA/420/2018 approved subject to conditions.
Orders
- ["Leave is granted to the Applicant to rely upon the amended plans listed in Condition 1 at Annexure 'A'." 'Pursuant to section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the Applicant is to pay those costs of the Respondent that were thrown away as a result of amending the development...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment