Lockwood Security Products Pty Ltd v Doric Products Pty Ltd (No 2) [2007] FCAFC 172
Lockwood should recover its costs of trial and two Full Court appeals, subject to a discount of 15 per cent on trial costs and 20 per cent on costs of the second Full Court appeal, reflecting Doric's success on issues of infringement and novelty. Costs are to be taxed and paid forthwith.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Costs Determination After Remittal From High Court
- Outcome
- Costs awarded to Lockwood, subject to discounts.
- Legal Topics
- ['patent Validity' 'infringement' 'costs' 'remittal' 'novelty' 'obviousness' 'fair Basis']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Costs Determination After Remittal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Entitlement of Lockwood to recover costs of trial and appeals' "Extent and basis for discount in costs due to Doric's partial success on certain issues" "Relevance and effect of findings regarding patent claims' validity, novelty, obviousness and infringement"]
Ratio Decidendi
Lockwood should recover its costs of trial and two Full Court appeals, subject to a discount of 15 per cent on trial costs and 20 per cent on costs of the second Full Court appeal, reflecting Doric's success on issues of infringement and novelty. Costs are to be taxed and paid forthwith.
Court Disposition
Costs awarded to Lockwood, subject to discounts.
Orders
- ['Lockwood to recover its costs on a party and party basis, subject to a discount of 15 per cent on the costs of the trial and 20 per cent on the costs of the second Full Court appeal.' 'Costs are to be taxed and paid forthwith.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment