Loclot Pty Ltd v Pullen and Others [2003] NSWSC 67
The statutory power under s 89(1)(c) of the Conveyancing Act 1919 includes power to modify an easement but does not permit the court to impose conditions (such as height restrictions or compensation) that are not specifically authorised by statute or consented to by the parties. Modification of the right of carriage way as requested is allowed in principle, but issues relating to temporary access and conditions on modification require further consideration or consent.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceedings / Application for Modification of Easement, Interim Decision
- Outcome
- Matter stood over for further consideration. No final order made at this stage.
- Legal Topics
- ['easements' 'modification or Extinguishment of Easements' 'injunctions' 'right of Carriage Way' 'court Powers Under Conveyancing Act 1919']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings / Application for Modification of Easement, Interim Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the court should modify a right of carriage way under Conveyancing Act 1919 s 89(1)(c)' 'Whether the court can impose conditions (e.g., height restrictions) on modification of an easement' "Whether temporary injunction may issue to restrain dominant tenement's use of carriage way during construction" 'Whether court can order provision for compensation in these circumstances']
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory power under s 89(1)(c) of the Conveyancing Act 1919 includes power to modify an easement but does not permit the court to impose conditions (such as height restrictions or compensation) that are not specifically authorised by statute or consented to by the parties. Modification of the right of carriage way as requested is allowed in principle, but issues relating to temporary access and conditions on modification require further consideration or consent.
Court Disposition
Matter stood over for further consideration. No final order made at this stage.
Orders
- ['No orders made on the further amended summons.' 'Matter stood over to enable parties to consider positions and for plaintiff to seek leave to further amend summons if desired.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment