DAVIES v PACIFIC ACCESS PTY LTD [1999] NSWSC 1262
The assault caused abdominal trauma which led to operative treatment and a continuing psychiatric disability; the plaintiff was not wholly incapable of work but was limited to low-stress employment of about two days per week. Damages were assessed accordingly, with the future economic loss component reduced in the addendum because of a mistaken calculation of the plaintiff's age, resulting in judgment for the plaintiff for $571,362.05 plus costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 July 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Personal Injury Damages Claim Arising From Assault Causing Physical Injury and Psychiatric Injury / Assessment of Damages After Liability Judgment Given on 28 May 1999; Amended on 16 July 1999
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff in the amended amount of $571,362.05 plus costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['assault Causing Physical Injury' 'causation' 'major Depressive Disorder' 'post Traumatic Stress Disorder' 'economic Loss' 'non Economic Loss' 'future Medical Expenses' 'workers Compensation Deduction']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Personal Injury Damages Claim Arising From Assault Causing Physical Injury and Psychiatric Injury / Assessment of Damages After Liability Judgment Given on 28 May 1999; Amended on 16 July 1999
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the plaintiff's abdominal symptoms, operations, psychiatric disability and emotional dysfunction resulted from the assault in Port Moresby." 'Whether the second operation arose out of the trauma or the first operation.' "The extent of the plaintiff's incapacity and residual earning capacity." 'The appropriate assessment of damages for non-economic loss, medical expenses, economic loss, superannuation loss, interest, Fox v Wood allowance and deduction of workers compensation.']
Ratio Decidendi
The assault caused abdominal trauma which led to operative treatment and a continuing psychiatric disability; the plaintiff was not wholly incapable of work but was limited to low-stress employment of about two days per week. Damages were assessed accordingly, with the future economic loss component reduced in the addendum because of a mistaken calculation of the plaintiff's age, resulting in judgment for the plaintiff for $571,362.05 plus costs.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff in the amended amount of $571,362.05 plus costs.
Orders
- ['Judgment for the plaintiff for $571,362.05 plus costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment