Regina v Lois Williams [2005] NSWCCA 100

Regina v Lois Williams [2005] NSWCCA 100

The parole condition requiring abstention from alcohol was quashed because the sentencing judge failed to comply with cl 6(1)(b) by not satisfying himself from the reports provided that it was feasible for the applicant to abstain, considering her longstanding addiction and history. The parole period was reduced as the original term was manifestly excessive given the circumstances, particularly the applicant's health and rehabilitation efforts.

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Applicant: Lois Williams
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 March 2005
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Leave to Appeal
Outcome
leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed in part; conditions and parole period varied
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Parole Conditions, Breach of Bond, Alcohol Addiction Treatment
Criminal Law Sentencing Parole Conditions Breach of Bond Alcohol Addiction Treatment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Lois Williams

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the parole condition requiring abstention from alcohol was properly imposed under cl 6 of Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Regulation 1999
  2. 2 Whether failure to comply with supervision was validly considered in sentencing
  3. 3 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive

Ratio Decidendi

The parole condition requiring abstention from alcohol was quashed because the sentencing judge failed to comply with cl 6(1)(b) by not satisfying himself from the reports provided that it was feasible for the applicant to abstain, considering her longstanding addiction and history. The parole period was reduced as the original term was manifestly excessive given the circumstances, particularly the applicant's health and rehabilitation efforts.

Court Disposition

leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed in part; conditions and parole period varied

Orders

  • Leave to appeal granted.
  • Quash parole period of 12 months; substitute parole period of 9 months from 13 August 2004 to 12 May 2005.