Darling Island Stevedoring & Lighterage Co Ltd v Long [1957] HCA 26
Regulation 31 of the Navigation (Loading and Unloading) Regulations imposes its statutory duty only on the 'person-in-charge' (i.e., supervisor or foreman), not on the employer. Therefore, the employer, Darling Island Stevedoring & Lighterage Co Ltd, cannot be held civilly liable for breach of the regulation committed by its employee, and the declaration discloses no cause of action against the defendant.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['statutory Duty' 'vicarious Liability' 'regulations Under Statute' 'civil Liability for Breach of Statutory Duty']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Does regulation 31 of the Navigation (Loading and Unloading) Regulations create a civil right of action?' 'Is such an action maintainable against an employer for breach committed by an employee?' "Does the definition of 'person-in-charge' include the employer?"]
Ratio Decidendi
Regulation 31 of the Navigation (Loading and Unloading) Regulations imposes its statutory duty only on the 'person-in-charge' (i.e., supervisor or foreman), not on the employer. Therefore, the employer, Darling Island Stevedoring & Lighterage Co Ltd, cannot be held civilly liable for breach of the regulation committed by its employee, and the declaration discloses no cause of action against the defendant.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- ['Judgment and order of the Supreme Court discharged' 'Judgment on the demurrer entered for the defendant' 'In lieu thereof, order that judgment on the demurrer be entered for the defendant' 'Appeal allowed with costs']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment