Lords Holdings Pty Ltd v Brizzi [2004] NSWSC 371
There is no genuine dispute as to the existence of the debt arising from the Plaintiff's borrowing as trustee. The ground put forward—that the Plaintiff is not liable due to cessation as trustee—is legally untenable. Late evidence supporting other grounds is inadmissible as not filed within the statutory timeframe; the application is dismissed and costs ordered on an indemnity basis.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Process / Judgment
- Outcome
- Originating Process dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['statutory Demand' 'trustee Liability' 'indemnity Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Originating Process / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether evidence not filed within the time required by s.459G(2) of the Corporations Act may be admitted' 'Whether there is a genuine dispute as to the existence of the debt claimed in the statutory demand' 'Whether a trustee remains liable for debts incurred during its trusteeship after ceasing to be trustee']
Ratio Decidendi
There is no genuine dispute as to the existence of the debt arising from the Plaintiff's borrowing as trustee. The ground put forward—that the Plaintiff is not liable due to cessation as trustee—is legally untenable. Late evidence supporting other grounds is inadmissible as not filed within the statutory timeframe; the application is dismissed and costs ordered on an indemnity basis.
Court Disposition
Originating Process dismissed
Orders
- ["Plaintiff to pay Defendant's costs on an indemnity basis"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment