Capolupo v Central Coast Council [2019] NSWLEC 1230
Because landowner's consent had been provided, the Subject Site was adequately serviced by water and electricity, sewage and stormwater drainage arrangements were adequate, suitable vehicle access was available, and cl 7.9 of Wyong Local Environment Plan 2013 had been addressed, the parties' agreed decision to uphold the appeal and grant development consent subject to conditions was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions. The Court was therefore required by s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreed decision.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Against Deemed Refusal of Development Application / Conciliation Conference Agreement and Final Orders
- Outcome
- The appeal is upheld and development consent is granted subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'deemed Refusal Appeal' 'conciliation Conference' 'residential Flat Building' 'development Consent' 'essential Services']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Against Deemed Refusal of Development Application / Conciliation Conference Agreement and Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the parties' agreed decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979." 'Whether the jurisdictional precondition in cl 7.9 of Wyong Local Environment Plan 2013 concerning essential services and suitable vehicle access was satisfied before granting development consent.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because landowner's consent had been provided, the Subject Site was adequately serviced by water and electricity, sewage and stormwater drainage arrangements were adequate, suitable vehicle access was available, and cl 7.9 of Wyong Local Environment Plan 2013 had been addressed, the parties' agreed decision to uphold the appeal and grant development consent subject to conditions was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions. The Court was therefore required by s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreed decision.
Court Disposition
The appeal is upheld and development consent is granted subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['Leave is granted to the Applicant to rely on the amended architectural, landscaping and engineering plans referred to in condition 1 of Annexure "A".' "Pursuant to section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs thrown away as a consequence of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment