Perpetual Trustees Victoria Ltd v Tsai [2004] NSWSC 745
Although the registered mortgage itself was indefeasible because it was registered without fraud by the mortgagee, the mortgage secured amounts payable under a separate secured agreement whose execution by the appellant was disputed and which did not attract indefeasibility. Because the first respondent had not produced evidence to the required standard on summary judgment that the loan agreement was signed by the appellant or that the loan was made to him, it had not shown that there was no arguable defence to the claims for possession and debt.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 August 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Summary Judgment in Mortgagee's Possession and Debt Proceedings / Appeal From Master Harrison in the Supreme Court Possession List
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed with costs; the order of the learned Master was set aside.
- Legal Topics
- ['indefeasibility of Registered Forged Mortgage' 'enforceability of Personal Covenant in Allegedly Forged Associated Loan Document' 'summary Judgment' 'possession by Mortgagee']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Summary Judgment in Mortgagee's Possession and Debt Proceedings / Appeal From Master Harrison in the Supreme Court Possession List
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a registered mortgage allegedly forged but registered without fraud of the mortgagee was indefeasible against the registered proprietor.' 'Whether the mortgagee was entitled to summary judgment for possession and debt where the associated loan agreement and covenant to repay were alleged to be forged and there was no evidence that the loan was made to the appellant.' 'Whether the learned Master erred in treating Ginelle Finance Pty Ltd v Diakakis [2004] NSW Conv R 56-064 as determinative.' 'Whether evidentiary material admitted before the Master supported summary judgment.']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the registered mortgage itself was indefeasible because it was registered without fraud by the mortgagee, the mortgage secured amounts payable under a separate secured agreement whose execution by the appellant was disputed and which did not attract indefeasibility. Because the first respondent had not produced evidence to the required standard on summary judgment that the loan agreement was signed by the appellant or that the loan was made to him, it had not shown that there was no arguable defence to the claims for possession and debt.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed with costs; the order of the learned Master was set aside.
Orders
- ['Appeal allowed with costs.' 'The order of the learned Master is set aside.' 'Stood over for further directions before the Registrar on Tuesday 10 August at 9 am.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment