Lowndes v The Queen [1999] HCA 29
The sentencing judge's decision to make a parole eligibility order was a discretionary judgment based on the evidence before him; the Court of Criminal Appeal did not identify any material error that would warrant appellate interference. Accordingly, the appellate court was not entitled to overturn the discretionary decision merely because it would have decided differently.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / High Court Appeal From Court of Criminal Appeal of Western Australia
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'indefinite Imprisonment' 'parole Eligibility' 'appellate Review of Sentencing Discretion']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / High Court Appeal From Court of Criminal Appeal of Western Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court of Criminal Appeal was entitled to set aside the parole eligibility order and order indefinite imprisonment' "Whether the sentencing judge's exercise of discretion involved appealable error"]
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge's decision to make a parole eligibility order was a discretionary judgment based on the evidence before him; the Court of Criminal Appeal did not identify any material error that would warrant appellate interference. Accordingly, the appellate court was not entitled to overturn the discretionary decision merely because it would have decided differently.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- ['Set aside the orders of the Court of Criminal Appeal of Western Australia in relation to the Crown appeal against sentence made on 8 August 1997' 'Dismiss the Crown appeal to that Court']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment