LU v Registrar of Births Deaths and Marriages (No 2) [2013] NSWDC 123
Because the child was conceived by a fertilisation procedure using sperm from a man who was not the mother's husband or de facto partner, s 14(2) and s 14(4) of the Status of Children Act 1996 irrebuttably presumed that man not to be the father. The competing presumptions arising from registration and acknowledgment were rebuttable and yielded to that irrebuttable presumption, and the Court's earlier finding of biological fatherhood did not amount to a finding of legal parentage under s 12. The father was therefore not the father by operation of law, so the Court could authorise the Registrar to remove his particulars, and could order inclusion of the female parent's registrable...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application for Alteration of a Child's Birth Registration / Principal Judgment After Uncontested Hearing
- Outcome
- Application granted in part by authorising removal of the father's particulars and conditionally ordering inclusion of the female parent's registrable information; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['de Facto Relationships' 'same Sex Couples' 'registration as Parent' 'birth Certificate' 'fertilisation Procedure' 'parentage Presumptions' "removal of Biological Father's Particulars" 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Application for Alteration of a Child's Birth Registration / Principal Judgment After Uncontested Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the District Court could order or authorise removal of the father's particulars from the child's birth registration under cl 17(4)(b)(i) of Sch 3 of the Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Act 1995." 'Whether the father was not the father by operation of law or otherwise, given the irrebuttable presumption in s 14(2) and s 14(4) of the Status of Children Act 1996 and the rebuttable presumptions arising from registration and acknowledgment.' 'Whether a previous finding that the father was the biological father enlivened the irrebuttable presumption in s 12 of the Status of Children Act 1996.' "Whether registrable information about the female parent should be included on the child's birth registration under s 19(1)(b) and cl 17 of Sch 3 of the Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Act 1995." 'Whether costs should be ordered against a submitting party.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the child was conceived by a fertilisation procedure using sperm from a man who was not the mother's husband or de facto partner, s 14(2) and s 14(4) of the Status of Children Act 1996 irrebuttably presumed that man not to be the father. The competing presumptions arising from registration and acknowledgment were rebuttable and yielded to that irrebuttable presumption, and the Court's earlier finding of biological fatherhood did not amount to a finding of legal parentage under s 12. The father was therefore not the father by operation of law, so the Court could authorise the Registrar to remove his particulars, and could order inclusion of the female parent's registrable...
Court Disposition
Application granted in part by authorising removal of the father's particulars and conditionally ordering inclusion of the female parent's registrable information; no order as to costs.
Orders
- ["The Registrar is authorised to remove from the child's birth registration any particular that identifies the father as the father of the child, pursuant to cl 17(4)(b)(i) of Sch 3 of the Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Act 1995." "Upon the removal of the particulars identified in order 1, on an...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment