R v Lu Lu [2002] NSWSC 14

R v Lu Lu [2002] NSWSC 14

No special facts or special circumstances were established to justify entertaining a further bail application; newly advanced factual contentions did not materially diminish the strength of the Crown case, and delay in trial date was not sufficiently material.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 January 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Bail Application Following a Revocation
Outcome
application for bail dismissed
Legal Topics
['bail' 'importation of Prohibited Drugs']
['criminal Law'] ['bail' 'importation of Prohibited Drugs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Bail Application Following a Revocation

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether special facts or special circumstances justify entertaining a successive bail application after revocation' 'Whether newly available information diminishes the strength of the Crown case']

Ratio Decidendi

No special facts or special circumstances were established to justify entertaining a further bail application; newly advanced factual contentions did not materially diminish the strength of the Crown case, and delay in trial date was not sufficiently material.

Court Disposition

application for bail dismissed

Orders

  • ['Application for bail is dismissed.']