Casaceli v Bega Valley Shire Council [2010] NSWLEC 1162

Casaceli v Bega Valley Shire Council [2010] NSWLEC 1162

Clause 26(1) of Bega Valley Local Environmental Plan 2002 makes the 2,000 m² minimum area for an unsewered lot an essential element or prerequisite for permissible subdivision in the Village Zone, not a development standard capable of variation under State Environmental Planning Policy No.1. Because the proposed subdivision would create unsewered lots of approximately 1011 m², it did not satisfy an essential requirement for permissibility and consent could not be granted.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 July 2010
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal Concerning Subdivision of Land / Adjudication Under Section 34(4) of the Land and Environment Court Act After Conciliation Conference; Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; development application refused.
Legal Topics
['development Application' 'subdivision of Land' 'minimum Lot Size' 'development Standard or Prohibition' 'permissibility of Development' 'on Site Sewage Effluent Disposal']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Development Application Appeal Concerning Subdivision of Land / Adjudication Under Section 34(4) of the Land and Environment Court Act After Conciliation Conference; Judgment

  1. 1 ['Whether Clause 26 of Bega Valley Local Environmental Plan 2002 imposed a development standard capable of variation or a prohibition/essential element of permissible development.' 'Whether the proposed subdivision of unsewered land into two allotments of approximately 1011 m² each was permissible in the Village Zone 2(v).']

Ratio Decidendi

Clause 26(1) of Bega Valley Local Environmental Plan 2002 makes the 2,000 m² minimum area for an unsewered lot an essential element or prerequisite for permissible subdivision in the Village Zone, not a development standard capable of variation under State Environmental Planning Policy No.1. Because the proposed subdivision would create unsewered lots of approximately 1011 m², it did not satisfy an essential requirement for permissibility and consent could not be granted.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; development application refused.

Orders

  • ['The appeal in respect of the property known as 15 to 17 Bermaguee Street, Quaama is dismissed.' 'The development application submitted to be Bega Valley Shire Council for the subdivision of the above land into 2 lots is determined by the refusal of consent.']