Samuel v R [2017] NSWCCA 239
The assessment of the utilitarian value of the applicant's plea of guilty was not in error; the sentencing judge properly considered the impact of the applicant's absconding and delay. The judge did not impermissibly increase the seriousness of the drug supply charge based on firearm possession, nor did she sentence on the basis of an offence not included in the Form 1. No appealable error was established.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence and Appeal Determination
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed. Leave to appeal granted. Extension of time granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentence Appeal' 'drug Offences' 'firearms Offences' 'utilitarian Value of Guilty Plea' 'objective Seriousness' 'form 1 Offences']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence and Appeal Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether sentencing judge erred in assessment of utilitarian value of guilty plea' 'Whether contemporaneous possession of firearms and drug supply increased seriousness of offending' 'Whether sentencing judge improperly took into account an offence not on Form 1']
Ratio Decidendi
The assessment of the utilitarian value of the applicant's plea of guilty was not in error; the sentencing judge properly considered the impact of the applicant's absconding and delay. The judge did not impermissibly increase the seriousness of the drug supply charge based on firearm possession, nor did she sentence on the basis of an offence not included in the Form 1. No appealable error was established.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed. Leave to appeal granted. Extension of time granted.
Orders
- ['Time within which the application for leave to appeal is to be filed extended until 5 June 2017.' 'Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment