Lucent Technologies Inc v Krone Aktiengesellschaft (No 2) [1999] FCA 1462
Order 58 Rule 31 is applicable to a party who, after initiation of proceedings, proposes to submit experimental proof, regardless of when the experiment was conducted. Therefore, evidence in para 111 is not admissible unless leave is granted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 October 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Commissioner of Patents Decision / Objection to Evidence During Hearing De Novo
- Outcome
- Objection upheld; evidence not admissible unless leave is granted; leave granted by consent after further discussion.
- Legal Topics
- ['patent Opposition' 'experimental Evidence' 'procedural Rules']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Commissioner of Patents Decision / Objection to Evidence During Hearing De Novo
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Does Order 58 Rule 31 of the Federal Court Rules apply to experiments conducted before the commencement of the proceeding?' 'Is evidence of an experiment admissible where the other party was not present during the conduct of the experiment?' 'Can leave be granted to admit experimental evidence not compliant with procedural directions?']
Ratio Decidendi
Order 58 Rule 31 is applicable to a party who, after initiation of proceedings, proposes to submit experimental proof, regardless of when the experiment was conducted. Therefore, evidence in para 111 is not admissible unless leave is granted.
Court Disposition
Objection upheld; evidence not admissible unless leave is granted; leave granted by consent after further discussion.
Orders
- ['O 58 r 31(2) operates to make para 111 not admissible unless leave is given.' 'Leave to admit para 111 granted by consent after discussion.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment