Application by Lucy Klewer [2014] NSWSC 1539
Ms Klewer's supporting affidavit did not substantially comply with s 14(3) of the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 because it fell considerably short of the minimum statutory requirements to list all prior leave applications, list all other proceedings instituted in Australia, and disclose all material facts. Section 15(1)(a) therefore required the Court to dismiss the application.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 November 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Institute Proceedings Under S 14 of the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 / On the Papers
- Outcome
- Summons filed 22 October 2014 is dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['leave to Institute Proceedings' 'vexatious Litigant' 'affidavit Requirements' 'dismissal of Application' 'tutor for Person Under Legal Incapacity']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Institute Proceedings Under S 14 of the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 / On the Papers
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Ms Klewer should be granted leave under s 14 of the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 to institute proceedings seeking her appointment as tutor for her son in existing Supreme Court proceedings.' 'Whether the affidavit filed in support of the application substantially complied with s 14(3) of the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008.' 'Whether s 15(1)(a) of the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 required dismissal of the application.']
Ratio Decidendi
Ms Klewer's supporting affidavit did not substantially comply with s 14(3) of the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 because it fell considerably short of the minimum statutory requirements to list all prior leave applications, list all other proceedings instituted in Australia, and disclose all material facts. Section 15(1)(a) therefore required the Court to dismiss the application.
Court Disposition
Summons filed 22 October 2014 is dismissed.
Orders
- ['Summons filed 22 October 2014 is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment