Perez v Northern Territory Department of Correctional Services (No 2) [2016] FCA 1354
The application for costs was dismissed because section 570 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) applied and the appellant failed to demonstrate that the respondents had engaged in any unreasonable act or omission that caused him to incur costs. Further, courts discourage belated costs applications, and the appellant was only partly successful on appeal, having failed on most grounds.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Post Judgment Costs Application
- Outcome
- Application for costs dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['practice and Procedure' 'costs' 'fair Work Act Adverse Action']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Judgment Costs Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the appellant is entitled to a costs order following partial success on appeal under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).' 'Whether section 570 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) prohibits a costs order in the circumstances.']
Ratio Decidendi
The application for costs was dismissed because section 570 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) applied and the appellant failed to demonstrate that the respondents had engaged in any unreasonable act or omission that caused him to incur costs. Further, courts discourage belated costs applications, and the appellant was only partly successful on appeal, having failed on most grounds.
Court Disposition
Application for costs dismissed.
Orders
- ['The application for costs filed by the Appellant on 11 August 2016 is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment