Luke Bateman v Divisional Holdings Pty Limited (first respondent) and Paul Hicks (second respondent)[1996] IRCA 60
The applicant was an employee of the first respondent; his termination was not for a valid reason and lacked procedural fairness, rendering the dismissal unlawful under the Industrial Relations Act 1988.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Industrial Relations Act 1988 S 170 EA / Final Decision After Hearing
- Outcome
- Application upheld; termination held to be unlawful; compensation ordered
- Legal Topics
- ['unlawful Termination' 'employee or Independent Contractor' 'procedural Fairness' 'compensation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under Industrial Relations Act 1988 S 170 EA / Final Decision After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant was an employee or independent contractor' 'Whether the termination was unlawful under the Industrial Relations Act 1988' 'Whether procedural fairness was afforded to the applicant' 'Whether summary dismissal was justified']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant was an employee of the first respondent; his termination was not for a valid reason and lacked procedural fairness, rendering the dismissal unlawful under the Industrial Relations Act 1988.
Court Disposition
Application upheld; termination held to be unlawful; compensation ordered
Orders
- ['The first respondent pay compensation to the applicant for unlawful termination in the sum of $8,780.00 (gross) within 21 days.' 'The first respondent pay damages to the applicant for wages in lieu of notice in the sum of $540.00 (gross) within 21 days.' 'The first respondent deduct tax at the appropriate rate...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment