Luxottica Retail Australia v Grant & Ors [2009] NSWSC 126
Nominal damages awarded for breach of contract and copyright infringement because the first defendant's conduct was not a conscious wrongdoing, no benefit accrued, plaintiff acted promptly to prevent misuse, and deterrent interests did not warrant additional damages.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Principal Judgment / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Nominal damages awarded; additional damages refused; delivery up of documents ordered; other claims dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['copyright Infringement' 'employment Contract Breach' 'nominal Damages' 'additional Damages' 'confidential Information' 'injunctions']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Principal Judgment / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the first defendant infringed copyright by emailing employer's documents to her home address" 'Whether the first defendant breached her contract of employment by forwarding confidential information' 'Whether the plaintiff is entitled to nominal damages or additional damages for copyright infringement' 'Whether quia timet injunctive relief is warranted']
Ratio Decidendi
Nominal damages awarded for breach of contract and copyright infringement because the first defendant's conduct was not a conscious wrongdoing, no benefit accrued, plaintiff acted promptly to prevent misuse, and deterrent interests did not warrant additional damages.
Court Disposition
Nominal damages awarded; additional damages refused; delivery up of documents ordered; other claims dismissed.
Orders
- ['Defendants to deliver up originals and all hard copies of specified documents and delete electronic copies within seven days.' 'Defendants and their legal representatives may retain copies of documents if they are exhibits until seven days after the expiration of appeal periods and must comply with confidentiality...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment