Knox, L. v. Grace Bros. Holdings Ltd [1985] FCA 433
The loading prescribed by Clause 33(g) of the Award applies only where employment is terminated by the employer; it does not apply where employment is terminated by the employee, whether by voluntary retirement or resignation. No entitlement to 17.5% leave loading arises on voluntary retirement unless annual leave...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Lynette Knox; Respondent: Grace Bros. Holdings Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 August 1985
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Single Judge Federal Court / Judgment of Full Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Awards, Annual Leave Loading, Termination of Employment, Entitlement to Leave Payments
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lynette Knox
Appellant
Grace Bros. Holdings Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Single Judge Federal Court / Judgment of Full Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an employee who voluntarily retires is entitled to annual leave loading under the relevant award
- 2 Interpretation of 'proportionate leave on termination' and whether loading applies when employment is terminated by the employee
Ratio Decidendi
The loading prescribed by Clause 33(g) of the Award applies only where employment is terminated by the employer; it does not apply where employment is terminated by the employee, whether by voluntary retirement or resignation. No entitlement to 17.5% leave loading arises on voluntary retirement unless annual leave is actually taken or termination is by the employer for reasons other than misconduct or disobedience.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal be dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment